User:Chris Mid

Hi, fellows. I'm new here as of June, 2005. Can't guarantee my interest will hold, but for the time being I do expect to be checking my discussion page semi-regularly.

Doppler Shift (or, What Gets My Goat)
I am here to root out a common fallacy. The redshift of far-away light due to the expansion of space, which implies the Big Bang, is not a Doppler shift. It's similar in effect, but the cause and math are very different. Unfortunately, it is often misrepresented in print, probably due to over-casual usage, and the misstatement is perpetuated on Wikki as well. Even the page devoted to it (Hubble's law) gets it wrong. For a more accurate description see redshift.

This tiny corner is a place I have something to offer. So, expect to see my work on a number of pages in the area of cosmology. When I get it in gear.


 * While you can derive a redshift simply from considerations of comoving distance equations, there is also a very real way in which the effect is related to the Doppler effect and the relativistic Doppler effect. Joshuaschroeder 30 June 2005 16:44 (UTC)