User:Chriscf/AfD evaluation/Examples

Some examples to demonstrate the evaluation in action.

Fairmont Preparatory Academy
There was some support for keeping the article, however, the arguments for deletion had a stronger grounding in policy. Additionally, in the event of a closer call, the unaddressed WP:V concerns would have made this default to delete rather than keep.

Harry Potter music
While the reasoning for delete seemed sound enough, the already-weak proposal had no support. Some would suggest this would be worth a WP:DRV to propose a relisting.

Archer School for Girls
As the article did not pose any direct concerns as regards core policies, this is does not qualify for a default delete. The arguments on both sides were somewhat weak, though the keepers survive on force of numbers alone, which is acceptable in small debates. Had this turned into a pile-on, the value of each successive "Keep per X" or "Delete per Y" would have decreased.

Good Egg
A straightforward dictionary definition with little chance of expanding got its comeuppance, with an almost unanimous "transwiki" decision. I say almost unanimous for good reason. The one "keep" had no basis in our policies (directly contradicting WP:WINAD), and the one "delete" contained as a rider "by all means move to the Wiktionary".