User:Chrishansen4/Photoheterotroph/Caffeinatedmicrobe Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chrishansen4


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chrishansen4/Photoheterotroph?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Photoheterotroph

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead

The lead has a great introduction of the topic of photoheterotrophs but doesn't actually summarize what is present in the article. The research section metabolism section ecology section and flowchart should be referenced in the lead.

The sources/links

The sources are really great and there are many citations that are from good sources and the links seem to work quite well.

The organization

I really like the organization there are lots of good titles for sections and the subheadings in the ecology section is quite useful. I might move the flowchart up on the page so that it is visible earlier in the page.

Neutral?

The content seems quite neural well sourced and well balanced.

Strengths?

I really liked the detail added in the Wikipedia article. I think that there is a nice combination of mentioning specific microorganisms and discussing the general category of photoheterotrophs. The article really makes you feel like you understand the main ideas of the topic.

Room for improvement?

I would move the flowchart to earlier in the page and may add a few images in order to help people to understand some more examples of photoheterotrophs.