User:Chrishansen4/Photoheterotroph/Gros04 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

Chrishansen4


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chrishansen4/Photoheterotroph?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Photoheterotroph

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: Accurately updated article lead to reflect the addition of an ecology and biogeochemical cycling section.

Content: Added a wealth of relevant information about photoheterotroph ecology, impacts on carbon cycling, etc.

Tone:Tone is neutral, relaying information rather than an opinion.

Sources are appropriate and extensive.

Organization: Organization is logical, all components make sense in their current location. A few extra sub headings under ecology may have been helpful.

Images and Media: Adequate for the current article.

Overall: Well researched and put together addition to a wikipedia article.