User:ChrisitanLowes/Great Comet of 1577/Ahmorgan23 Peer Review

General info
ChrisitanLowes
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:ChrisitanLowes/Great Comet of 1577
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Great Comet of 1577

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

This section starts with a concise overview of the comet. The lead only includes information from the observation section so another sentence may need to be added to cover all the topics in the article. The sentence about the distance from the sun(last sentence) could be moved to the sixth paragraph instead of the lead.

Content

The content in the article is well written with a neutral tone and what seems to be updated information based on the newer references. Overall the content has a lot of good information but the organization could be a bit better in the observation section. The observation section is a big chunk of the article and could maybe be split into Brahe's observations and others observations. Another section that could be added if information could be found would be possible characteristics of the comet or events caused by the comet, just to better balance the article. The Art and Literature section could also be expanded on so there is more variety in information. The pictures added are well captioned and are good visuals to help readers understand the information presented. There are also many links to other wiki pages which makes this page more likely to be discovered.

Overall There is a lot of good information being added and is organized well, it just may be more useful to separate Brahe and others observations. The article is information heavy in the observation area which may miss some points of the characteristics of the comet or what events this comet caused from leaders thinking it was a bad omen. The last two sections are not well cited, but I saw in your comments that you plan on fixing that!