User:Chrismevs/Sumo languages/Nansks Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chrismevs


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Chrismevs/Sumo languages


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sumo languages

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead has been updated and contains new information. The introductory sentence is concise and clearly describes the topic but the lead is a little detailed towards the end. The major sections are also described clearly. It also presents added information that is not in the main article. Overall, the lead is well summarized.

Content
The content is very well related to the topic. It is also up to date with the resources and current information within them. No information or content is missing but the lead can be stronger if a little more information can be added.

Tone and Balance
Yes, the content added is neutral. None of the claims are biased in any way. The viewpoints present are equally balanced. I also liked how the author also added the modern time issue that the people are facing. The content is not trying to persuade the readers. In all, the tone is balanced.

Sources and References
All of the content is backed up. The content also fairly reflects the sources. There are plenty of resources cited by the author. So, yes, the author uses the literature available. Yes, the sources are recent and not too dated. The sources does contain a diverse group of authors. The author uses already uses good available articles and the links also work.

Organization
The lead is easy to follow and clear to understand. There are no spelling or grammatical errors. The content is also clearly structured.

Images and Media
There are no images and media at the moment but there is still a lot of time to add them.

Overall Impression
Yes, the quality of article has definitely increased because a lot of new information added. The strength of the lead would be how all the information is structured. The content is already well written but it can be improved by adding more relevant information. The one thing I liked was how the author mentioned some references that will be used in the future. This goes to show the clarity of the author's vision for the article. Overall, the lead is good but towards the end it goes into just a little detail which can be altered.

Best of luck !