User:Christiang1122/Cruelty-free


 * SandBox
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes Are some areas under- or over-developed? over
 * Is it written neutrally? yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? yes Are the citations reliable? yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? no Adding citations
 * Brands That Are Cruelty-Free
 * The campagin section: does in fact need work, it just talks about the campagins and why they were needed for cruelty-free. I feel like that section lack it could've talk more about why these campaigns are important to cruelty- free organization. Instead they told the history view points of the situation instead of telling why its truly important and why we should be invovled with that organization.
 * https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/brands/amika/
 * https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/brands/anastasia-beverly-hills/
 * https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/brands/becca/
 * https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/brands/bh-cosmetics/
 * https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/brands/becca/
 * https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/brands/bh-cosmetics/