User:Chromium2451/Wolframite/Haoyu Cui Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chromium2451


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Wolframite


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Chromium2451/Wolframite

Evaluate the drafted changes
Structure - The content added to the article is an independent part, does not contain personal subjective opinions, and provides an intuitive introduction to wolframite by showing mineral properties and crystal structure. This can be done by adding more pictures, such as ore samples and markers on the map of the relevant places of origin. Or the introduction and pictures of a series of uses of this type of ore and industrial products in daily life after the discovery and naming of this ore at the beginning.

Content - Added content is related to the content of the article itself, which is well in line with wikipedia's neutrality. At the same time, the content added in the draft is overall smooth, but you can try to explain some more technical terms to ensure that all readers can read it. In addition, the article contains almost no spelling or grammatical errors.

Neutrality & Coverage - Since this entry is currently a stub, content added to the article makes it even better. The information included is not concentrated in one section, doubling the content coverage of the entry. Therefore, the added information does not bias the article towards this section, but rather makes it more balanced overall.

References - The content that has been added appears to be accurate and reflects the information contained in the source. All added sections are supported by citations. These references were all written within the last decade and are all reliable sources, not articles on random websites. These references are also written by different types of authors and published in different countries. The reference can be improved by adding more sources. This will further validate the information contained in the article, and it will also make the reference more accurately representative of the available literature.

Overall - In summary, the content is very straight forward, nice to add more usage, content neutral and easy for the reader to read. The added information makes the entry more complete. You can try to insert more pictures, such as the origin and distribution of the ore, and add relevant maps at the same time to improve the article. At the same time, we can try to develop more aspects, such as the corresponding smelting and processing of ores, and examples of the practical application of extracts and finished products in life. Citing more literature and reference materials makes the overall content more complete and objective.