User:Chuckkillsbucks/Benthic comb jelly/Gracieorwig Peer Review

Lead


 * no new content has been updated

content


 * content has been updated to three sections; description, discovery, and diet.
 * The beginning of each paragraph in the section mentions the species that the information is talking about, so not confuse the readers about what species is being referenced
 * each bit of content is assume dup to date, with references cited in 2021.
 * there is probably bits and pieces of specifics within the content that are missing such as small details about its physical appearance.

tone and balance


 * the content is neutral sounding, no usage of specific pronouns, uses 'it'.
 * no biased ideals presented in article, content presented from the chosen articles show a research point of view and not personal


 * I think the description view is a little under-represented, it is said that the jellies can be found in deep depths is there a chance they the jellies have the ability to biolumienate? other than that question about the description the other points within the content is represented well.
 * the tone presented is clear and factual, no usage of trying to presuade the readers towards and/or away a specific viewpoint

sources and references


 * the new content is supported by new references, all within the last few years
 * the content is transferred over smoothly and represented well, without plagiarism
 * there are probably more scientific articles that could be included, but the ones included are diverse enough to provide different ranges of information
 * the links work within the content of the article

organization


 * the content is well-written, clear and to the point and little fluff
 * no errors that I could see while reading
 * the content is broken down into sections that the content refers to, well divided.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)