User:Chunanarita/Mercy Oduyoye/Sydneyhill24 Peer Review

Hi! I am peer-reviewing your wikipedia contribution for WGS301. Your article is looking great and there is some really great information there. I just have a few notes that I would recommend reviewing:

1. There are a somewhat significant amount of grammatical errors that make it difficult to follow the narrative. Maybe ask someone else to review your article in person with you to make sure what you are trying to say is clear.

2. Your 5th reference, the interview with Oduyoye is very heavily referenced. It is an interview with information coming straight from her so it might be okay that it is heavily referenced, but maybe include some more information in the bulk of the article from other sources as well to be safe.

3. I noticed there are quite a few sentences that seem like there should be a reference attached at the end but there isn't. Maybe try to place more attachments to the sources in the body of the article. I even noticed a quote without a reference at the end of it. It is very crucial that you always include a reference after a quote - it can be considered plagiarism if you do not do this.

4. Maybe try to find some more sources - it does not appear that any new sources have been used in comparison to the wikipedia page prior to you working on it. Additionally, 3 of the sources are from the same scholarly journal. A wider variety of sources would make this wikipedia contribution very strong.

5. Lastly, your quotes do not have page numbers after them and while many wikipedia articles do not, our professor for this course asked us to add page numbers after direct quotes from sources. If you can, try to find page numbers for your quotes and place them in brackets after each quote.

Overall, well done! (scroll down for a more detailed review) Sydneyhill24 (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chuananarita


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chunanarita/Mercy_Oduyoye


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercy_Oduyoye

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has been changed slightly - the date of birth was changed and a source was added. Make sure to check this information is correct :). The lead is concise and explains the article well. It does not look like you have added any new sources to this article. It might be a good idea to do some more research and add more sources. This article is a good one to work on as there is not lots of information on the original article. I do not feel any of this content is trying to persuade me to think a certain way - it is all factual which is great. It looks like the content is up to date. The biggest thing I am noticing is a lack of in-text citations for information that has been added to the article. Please cite every new piece of information that has been added. I think the content added accurately reflects the articles it is sourced from. There is not much variety in which sources have been used to add information. Adding more variety of sources and using more information from other sources would strengthen this article. The section break-down of the article is good. Everything in the article seemed relevant, some grammatical errors distracted me from what I was reading. The article does seem neutral and the source that is an interview with the individual the article is about is great - just might be relying too heavily on that source alone. The links seem to work for the citations. Each fact does not seem to be supported by in-text citations - some of the information I am not sure where it is coming from. The sources seem to be neutral. Additionally, 3 of your sources are from the Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion which is a great source - but some more variety in sources would strengthen the article. Sydneyhill24 (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)