User:Chxbu/Vulcanoctopus hydrothermalis/Gabrodi Peer Review

General info
User:Chxbu
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Vulcanoctopus hydrothermalis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
The lead is very short, it may be helpful to add some more information that gives a brief and broad overview of the species. Some other articles have leads that discuss a little more about spatial distribution or depth range, or how the species was found/taxonomically defined. It is concise which is good, but doesn't reflect new content added by my peers.

Content
There's a lot of great content on this page, that is very relevant to the species. The page offers a lot of important insights into the species and its existence in the marine environment. Editors added important information about hunting and feeding methods, female vs. male morphology (which I thought was especially interesting and unique, not a lot of pages include this), specific behaviors, and an endoparasitic host-parasite relationship. There are a few things that could be added, specifically information about mating (methods to attract mates, number of mates the species usually has, etc), reproduction (where, what time of year, how often, etc), and impacts of climate change on the species or other anthropogenic threats (i.e. harvesting, habitat destruction). I realize it's not always easy to find all this information about deep sea species, however perhaps certain aspects of these topics could be added if possible. Overall, there is a goof overview provided, which was clearly accentuated by your edits.

Tone and Balance
Tons is neutral, the page is solely informative and offers balanced information that does not attempt to persuade readers to have a certain opinion. I don't notice any biases.

Organization
The context added is clear and easy to read. The article is well organized, starting with broader ideas like habitat, behavior, and description, and then getting more specific at the end with the information about the host-parasite relationship. I didn't notice any major errors.

Overall Impressions
This Wikipedia page has a lot of great information, especially considering it may have been difficult to find many additional sources. It's impressive that so much could be gathered from the 7 sources there, and how well it is organized. I believe you guys added a lot of important facts about the species that really help provide readers with a thorough idea of its behavior and existence in the marine environment. I realize I made some suggestions, but also that they may not be possible to add due to a lack of information. The page is still really strong without changing much/adding anything I suggested.