User:Ci2003/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Snap-On

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because of my dad. He was a mechanic at Harley Davidson and loved Snap-on and has a big tool box made by them at our house.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Article has a clear lead that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic
 * Lead does give examples but some do not correlate with major sections of the article
 * Includes information that is not present in article (blue-point, competitors)
 * Lead is not overly detailed
 * Relevant to topic
 * Content seems to be up to date, edits made in 2022
 * Noticed that there is definitely content missing
 * Tone and balance are good; no bias
 * Sources seem reliable, some links did not work but for the most part they did
 * Only two images, could use more with better captions

Talk page


 * They talked about worth
 * Fair use rationale for image
 * Misleading?

Overall


 * Needs improvement
 * More images
 * Better citations/more citations
 * underdeveloped/ needs added information about other popular items