User:Cicada.greene/The Front Bottoms/Noodlesoup 110033 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cicada.greene


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cicada.greene/The Front Bottoms


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Front Bottoms

Evaluate the drafted changes
The changes and additions added to the article are organized and clear. Adding more sections to organize the information by year is a good choice, and allows readers to find information easier. For the draft itself, I did find it a little difficult to understand exactly where the information was going to be added or changed. However, the content is relevant to the topic and provides better understanding. The content is neutral and written well given the sources included. The sections that are planned to be added to the article are organized and will make the article more complete. The list of past and present band members is well written and organized in chronological order. The section regarding inspirations could be a part of the lead section as an additional paragraph to make the lead section a bit longer and it would give the reader a better idea of the type of music the band makes. Overall, I think the draft will add a good amount of organization to the original article and make it easier for readers to understand.