User:Ciciii/sandbox

"Article evaluation" Rape in China
 * 1: Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Answer: Yes, the things in this article such as the history, analysis, social stigma cast on victims of rape are all relevant to the topic--Rape in China. The history provides a general structure of the rape in China and the analysis is based on the data of the rape in China. the data and history provides related information for this topics and show some sociological facts such as the contrast between female and male’s rape. The information stresses injustice of female’s cases and ignorance of Male’s rape. Something distract me is that " A girl and her mother tried to register a complaint against a rapist, but Zhong Xiancong, a police official, did not register it." In my perspective, who is this girl and who is this mother in this passage? In this case, readers might not know whether this example is true. I believe the writer should modify it and make nothing doubting.
 * 2: Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Answer:This is neutral. All the statements just based on some reliable websites and summarization of data. In my opinion, I believe this article is neutral cause it lists and explains several facts in China such as the victims of rape in China often remain silent and do not report the crime. And then the writer gives some reasons to it and these reasons are all true such as traditional culture holds that being raped is shameful. So I think the writer is considering the things which are true and therefore I believe this article is neutral. There are no claims heavily biased toward a particular position. There is no argument of our topic. The editors just provide information on it and not claim their viewpoints.
 * 3: Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Answer: I think some viewpoints are underrepresented. About history. There are just three sentences for it and only based on Qing dynasty. The editors just provide a summary of rape in China by using limited information. I think there should be more content about rape in ancient China and contemporary China. Besides, the phrase" the law against rape in China have been criticized by numerous sources" is underrepresented because there are only two examples which are listed on Wikipedia. I think the writer can further extend the examples of these sources. At the same time, there do have some statistics about the topic on Wikipedia. However, there is only one chart but no explanations and the conclusions. I suggest the writer to add some analysis about this chart.
 * 4： Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Answer:I check citations, all of them work except the third one. The link page of the third one is not found.Sources all support the claims in the article such as an article “male rape now a crime in china”, some perpetrators just claim that their behaviors just “nothing but a slap on the wrist”. China didn’t pay a lot attention on same-saxes’ rape. They don’t think men and rape men. This article support claims in the article that male rights in rape cases only developed in recent years. Furthermore, "as in many countries, in China only a small fraction of rape victims ever charges their attackers. In a country of 1.3 billion, fewer than 32,000 sex crimes were reported in 2007, the latest year for which government statistics are available." supports the claim that "victims of rape in China often remain silent and do not report the crime" on Wikipedia. But among these sources, there is a PDF named “why do some men use violence against women and how can we prevent it”. The editors just briefly mention that women are victims in rape cases because they don’t have courage to report. If they do, they will be shame in the society. However, the editors didn’t mention how we can take actions to protect ourselves.
 * 5: Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?       Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources?        If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Answer: Some facts are not reliable such as popular activist Guo Jianmei and her story. Her story gives an example of a man who raped over 100 women. There is no confirmation towards truth of the information. Moreover, the statement is not very clear, who is the person that raped over 100 women? The claim is extremely confusing. Besides, some websites don’t include published years. These are neutral sources because editors don’t place their viewpoints on it.
 * 6: Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Answer: Firstly, the information is not enough in history. They summarize the history just based on traditional views in ancient China instead of the whole history from ancient China till now. Secondly, the statistic is only about 2013 Multi-country Study on Men and on Domestic Violence. However, this year is already 2017; 4 years pass, but there are no updated statistics. And there are also no surveys about past years. Therefore, I strongly recommend the writer to add something new about it. Third, the writer provides a chart in Wikipedia but there is no conclusion and explanation, so I suggest the writer to add some analysis.
 * 7: Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations,       if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Answer: I check out the Talk page of the article and find there in no conversations are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic.
 * 8: How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Answer: This article is rated from the links of the references and is a part of the WikiProjects such as WikiProject China, WikiProject Feminism and WikiProject Gender Studies.
 * 9: How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Answer:Wikipedia just conclude some authoritative people’s opinions and based on some facts such as some law cases and news. The things posted on Wikipedia should be verified. But when we talk about the topics on class. We just talk based on our own personal opinions and information received from others such as teachers.
 * Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating    and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign    your feedback with four tildes —.