User:Cinadon36/sandbox10

Should WP Voice state that GC-side narrative downplays/declines the importance of 1963 violence?
According to wikipedia's policy WP:WIKIVOICE: Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in Wikipedia's voice. Unless a topic specifically deals with a disagreement over otherwise uncontested information, there is no need for specific attribution for the assertion, although it is helpful to add a reference link to the source in support of verifiability. Further, the passage should not be worded in any way that makes it appear to be contested.

I have searched the literature and I found nowhere that the point made by Demetriou and Papadakis is contested. Attributing the material makes it look contested. So I suggest we add a sentence at the beginning of the paragraph.


 * Demetriou 2014: GC narrative follows a denialist approach (see citation in the article)
 * Papadakis 2008: GC narrative revert the roles of the aggressor and the victim (see the previous section)

--


 * Narrative, Memory and History Education in Divided Cyprus A Comparison of Schoolbooks on the “History of Cyprus”


 * ANASTASIOU, H. (2002). Communication Across Conflict Lines: The Case of Ethnically Divided Cyprus. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 581–596. doi:10.1177/0022343302039005005

---