User:Cindycyz/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sylviane Agacinski

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am intrigued by the life experiences of Sulviane Agacinski and herfeminist impact on the French political environment.

Evaluate the article

 * 1) The lead section is good in that it concisely and clearly introduces Sylviane Agacinski and her feminist's impact to the readers in two sentences.
 * 2) The contents are good given they are relevant to Sylviane Agacinski and centers around her feminist actions. It could improve more by adding more information about her life experiences (as an "author, professor" indicated in the lead section).
 * 3) The organization of the article is clear and the writing quality is good.
 * 4) The image quality is good, well-captioned, and adhere to the Wikipedia's copyright regulations, which gives the readers a good understanding of Sylviane Agacinski.
 * 5) Currently there aren't any discussions on the "Talk Page."
 * 6) The article's overall status is considered good to me. Its overall layout and information is clear and concise, but it could add more information about Sylviane Agacinski's life experience so that the readers can have a deeper understanding of her.