User:CitadelArchives009/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Dr. Stone

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason why I chose to evaluate this article is because I'm already invested in the overall narrative of the series. I'm completely caught up on the anime adaptation and have read a little from the source material itself. The series seems like a perfect for the genre we're covering as it's set in a post-apocalyptic world and features small elements of science-fiction. It also features a pretty competent story line with some great-written characters and world-building that expands upon the lore within the set universe.

Evaluate the article
The article's lead is brief but also very informative. It provides a quick and concise description of the series that provides the reader with an idea as to what the narrative is about without going to specific with any significant plot details. The content of the article itself is relevant to the topic concerning post-apocalyptic pieces of entertainment. A lot of the content itself seems up to date, but more information can be added regarding the second season of the show and how it was received by both critics and fans. In regards to the overall tone of the article, it's presented in a non-biased viewpoint. The article is presented in a way in which it doesn't comes off as persuasive in favor of any sort of narrative an editor may be trying to push. Many sources featured in the reference section seem to be reliable enough. Many of them are current and come from a variety of different outlets and websites to keep the article unbiased and all of them happen to work as well. In terms of images, there aren't very many. The only image that's present is the cover of the first volume of the manga. The talk page also doesn't have many contributions. There aren't any spelling or grammatical errors to be found either. When it comes to what I personally believe can be contributed to this article in order to improve it, I believe an entire section dedicated to the two creators would benefit this article in a significant way. I would love to go deep into their thought process behind creating this series and how they each found success from the initial reception the book received following publication of its first several chapters. I also believe a section covering the scientific accuracy of many of Senku's (the protagonist) experiments over the course of the series would also be beneficial for not just the article, but for the readers as well. The article is rated as Start-Class, which feels like an appropriate article for myself to contribute to and improve upon.