User:Citmoreno9/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Killer ape theory

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article personally because the killer ape theory is an interesting subject to myself. It matters because the theory behind it is that violence was the final push for human evolution. My impression is that it could be a theory that could be proven with todays research about human psychology.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article does contain a lead section. In the first sentence it states the theory and what it is about while being very brief and introducing the needed information for the topic. The articles content is relevant to the topic and its contents is up to date, one source leading back to 2019. The tone and balance of the article is fairly neutral just describing and detailing about the topic while also bringing in a source that opposes the theory. The sources are reliable, they are backed up by a reliable source. The authors have a variety, the information is taken from various authors and the links date back to the online and book source. The article is organized by categorizing the summary and reception into their own spaces. There are no images in the article. In the talk page there is no current conversation just a critique that the editor had to change. The next chat box is from the editor who fixed the critique they were given. The overall status of the article is good and brief. It goes straight into the points and it has a reference of the opposing theory as well.~Citlalli Moreno