User:Citmoreno9/Killer ape theory/Shaheenl Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Citmoreno9


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Citmoreno9/Killer ape theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Killer ape theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
Looking at the draft, It seems relevant to the topic and article it is being published to. The content is well organized and neatly labeled to show what each section is addressing. The tone and balance of the draft is not biased or filled with opinions. The added content is neutral. Overall the content added is an improvement. There does need to be some changes in regards to the grammar and punctuation. Its a bit wordy and can be condensed to be more concise. there are some double spaces in places and just needs to be overlooked and see where it can be cleaned up. Another improvement could be more sources being added, there are only two and adding more could help the article. Overall the content and the sources are reliable and easily accessible. It follows the requirements and only needs small changes and edits to be better and easier to understand.