User:Cjaneellen/Sport psychology/Michellevp16 Peer Review

General info
Cjaneellen
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cjaneellen/Sport psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sport psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is clear, concise, and informative. The lead allows the reader to get a good, broad understanding of the topic. The lead does a great job at touching on major sections in the lead even if it is just a sentence or two. The lead does a good job at presenting information that will be touched on later.

Content and Source/References

As to the content of the article, the article is clearly well structured. The article does seem up to date. The section, "applied sport psychology today", is clearly up to date and well structured. Nonetheless, I would recommend looking into any current information. As long as it is reliable and relevant, the information would benefit the section.

Tone and Balance

Overall, the article is neutral. The articles claims do not appear biased. Additionally, the article does not have a particular viewpoint. The content of the article provides the reader with a neutral stand point. I greatly appreciate that there is a section on the "debate over the professionalization of sport psychology". Additionally, I would just make sure that the section is a neutral as it can be especially because it is a debate section.

Organization

As previously mentioned, the article is well structured and clearly presented. I do not see any major grammar or spelling issues. Nonetheless, I would recommend looking in more detail.

Images and Media

Although images are not essential, I believe this article could possible benefit from more images especially since sports are well photographed.

Overall, the comments in the sandbox would greatly benefit and improve the quality of the article. I would recommend taking my suggestions in account. I strongly encourage the user to review any grammar and wording in order to strengthen the article especially since the article is lengthy.