User:Cjhess/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Angkor Wat
The first source I clicked on was source number 6, and from my understanding of citing and using proper sources, this source is a tourist information website which does not fall under the standards for proper sources. The content throughout the article seemed fairly unbiased. It contained a lot of information ranging from what it is to how it was created. The article was broken down into sections that explained the etymology, history, architecture, and what it is today. On the talk page there was a discussion about whether the temple was for Hindu or Buddhist traditions, and it turned out it was for both. This article is also a featured article, and it has been of interest to multiple WikiProjects.