User:Cjhope94/sandbox

'''•	Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, nothing distracted from the topic itself. However, I think it would be helpful to give more of a description of the movie.

•	'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

The article is neutral, nothing seems to be biased at all, just facts.

•	Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

A synopsis is underrepresented, it talks more about its recognition than what the story is actually about.

'''•	Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Yes the links work and all the sources support the article.

'''•	Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

They are coming from other Wiki sources and are neutral as well.

'''•	Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?'''

A brief description of each character.

'''•	Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?'''

it has been rated for low importance, needs an image

'''•	How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?'''

rated as Stub-Class, not part of any Wiki Projects

•	How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Not enough description or depth to it.