User:Cjl0213/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
String Quartets, Op. 33 (Haydn) - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
We were assigned it.

Evaluate the article
The first sentence is good, it provides a when, where, and what. The rest of the lead is a little anecdotal. It does little to address the actual piece and focuses more on context. The content is relevant. Not a lot about context in the actual article, but that is a more general thing, so that is not necessarily a bad thing. One of the links in the article is no longer current and does not look very scholarly. It is from a blog post. There is also a visual analysis that is from YouTube that is an audio with words detailing the analysis. This is not a very official source, especially because there is no information on the education of the creator. The article tone seems fairly consistently neutral, but the fourth movement from "The Joke" quartet has a lot more information than the rest of the movements or pieces. This is probably because it is the most well-known of the opus, but it is not particularly in line with Wikipedia's equity of information policy. Writing quality is decent. There could be links to midi of the examples of the beginnings of pieces shown in the article. Also links to relevant or historical performances would be a good addition. The talk page has a little bit of drama about the naming, but does not look like something bad enough to have gotten anyone banned. I think the article is decent, but seems like a rough draft that has a decent number of things that could be added to flush out the more bare areas of the article.