User:Cjsigafoos/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Feminist philosophy

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article because it goes in depth what Feminist Philosophy is and that is what this course is about. This article matters because it talks about the main points of Feminist Philosophy but also the subfields of it too.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

When starting to look at this article the first words are Feminist Philosophy and they are in bold so you know right away what this article is about. Everything in this article is relevant to the topic and there were no distractions while reading it through. When going through the citations I noticed that there was one from 1989,1990 and 1991, there are other articles from 2020 but I feel those 3 may be a little outdated and could be changed with more recent articles to support the idea of Feminist Philosophy. I feel like the tone of this article is very neutral and has no biased toward it. Out of all the citations that I have clicked on they have worked and took me either to the website or the book, some of the citations did not have a link attacked so I was unable to find that reference. While reading the talk page the first comment was made in 2006 and from what I am reading this article has come a long way since then with multiple people added in references and changing wording around and making the paragraphs better. This article goes more in depth of what feminist philosophy actually is and what goes into it a little bit more then we have learned so far in class.