User:Cjv419/30 Rock (season 1)/Zd89 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cjv419


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cjv419/30 Rock (season 1)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 30 Rock (season 1)

Lead
The Lead has been updated to reflect new content added by my peer; it also has an introductory sentence to what the information they've added will be about. This lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections, but I do not find it needed for this article. The Lead is concise and not overly detailed.

Content
Overall, the content is sound. As someone who has not seen 30 Rock, I feel like the content written gives me a clear enough picture of what is going on in the show. This article does not deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps, but as for information about a TV show, I do not think it's necessary.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the content added is neutral and none of the claims seem biased towards any of the characters. The tone is so neutral I cannot give any feedback on their viewpoint being present anywhere in it, therefore I cannot say they were biased, over/under representing, or persuasive in any of the content.

Sources and References
The author only added one source, but it checks out as a reliable source of information. The source is not biased and it is written neutrally so it is a good choice for a source. The content does reflect what the source says. Since the season of the show the article is about is not current, I would not expect to find a current source, so I do not think that applies here. I do recommend adding more in-text citations unless everything else but the last sentence was something you already knew, but overall I think the source used is a good one.

Organization
The content itself is very concisely written and it is clear and easy to read. However, there are some grammatical mistakes so I would definitely tell you to double check it. There is some missing commas and spelling errors but nothing that makes the content misunderstood. Finally, the content is well-organized.

Images and Media
There was no media added.

Overall impressions
I think the content added will add to the overall content of the original article. Other than the grammar and spelling mistakes, I think this draft is ready to be uploaded to Wikipedia, and I think it will last. I think what the draft does really well is that it gives you small details of the backstory that help you better understand these character's future arcs in the TV show. I think you did a great job, and I hope you get to see your work last on Wikipedia!