User:Ckatz/RfA thanks


 * 1) Support!  Beat the nom.  Will not go nutzo with the tools.  Unlikley to block good-faith contributors without discussion first.  &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 22:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC) (02.03.08)
 * 2) Support per nom.  Dloh  cierekim  23:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) (02.03.08)
 * 3) Support No problems here. --  S iva1979 Talk to me 00:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (02.03.08)
 * 4) Support Some very impressive contributions and experience. Definitely not going to misuse his new admin tools. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (02.03.08)
 * 5) Support Great edit summary usage, good edit count, deserves the MOP. :) -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  00:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (02.03.08)
 * 6) Support - should have had the mop by now.   jj137   (talk)  01:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. Very good editor.  Malinaccier (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Support - I have the utmost confidence that this user will make a tremendous admin. Excellent editor, very versatile. Got tinkles.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 02:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) Late to the party nom. support.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (01.03.08)
 * 10) Support. Good all around, plus I have always been impressed with how well this individual handles unreasonable editors. Doczilla  RAWR! 03:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Support: I find that the editor has handled him/herself well in light of several bad-faith editors, and that the contributions thus far have been very positive. I see no reason why you would abuse adminship if so granted.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) Support You're not an admin?  Burner 0718  JibbaJabba!  03:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) Support Just talk to your partner about classical music stuff, OK? Keepscases (talk) 04:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) Looks good.  Majorly  (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) Support. Long-term editor with broad experience. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) Support. · AndonicO  Hail!  11:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) Support - trustworthy editor. Addhoc (talk) 11:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 18) Support no evidence they will abuse the tools. Spencer  T♦C 12:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 19) Support Seen him around doing great work. Will certainly make an excellent administrator, no doubt at all. --PeaceNT (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 20) Some outstanding work over at AIV. Rudget . 17:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 21) Support per above. NHRHS  2010 NHRHS2010 19:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 22) Support And this Rfa didn't happen before because...? :) Jmlk  1  7  20:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 23) Support - prolific editor, great vandal-fighter, with the scars to show. Bearian (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 24) We've certainly been on opposite sides of the table on some issues, but I don't feel as if he would be a bad, or careless administrator. seresin | wasn't he just...? 22:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) yup - all the best Khu  kri  23:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 26) Support Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 27) Support As per nom. Good track with over 14000 mainspace edits.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 28) Support No problems here. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 29) Support. After reviewing Ckatz's contributions, I am confident that he has the necessary experience, and has sufficient levels of trust, to function as a project administrator. Best of luck, AGK (contact) 20:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 30) Support, seems a solid candidate. I am reasonably satisfied that they will not abuse the tools.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC).
 * 31) Yes Will (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 32) Support Sounds good Fattyjwoods  ( Push my button  ) 02:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 33) Support Best of luck. :) GlassCobra 07:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 34) Support. Anyone who has an external website dedicated to hating them, must be doing something right!  I've seen this user's work related to Canadian places and Canadian stuff.  He made a great little template for 8-way geographic locations.  &mdash;  MJC detroit  (yak) 15:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 35) Strong support, very responsible editor. @pple complain 17:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 36) Support Pleasent, civil, well-rounded editor who can only be a net benefit to the work Pedro : Chat  20:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 37) Support good luck. Pundit | utter  01:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 38) Support - Will make a fine addition to the admin corps. — Travis talk  16:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 39) Support - --Bhadani (talk) 16:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 40) Support Sumoeagle179 (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 41) I have had positive experiences with Ckatz at WP:HEROES. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  05:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 42) Bandwagon support. This candidate is a good one.  нмŵוτн  τ  14:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 43) Support Time to get your long overdue mop. &#9775;Ferdia O'Brien (T) / (C) 16:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 44) Support per below? --Niyant (talk) 20:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 45) Support You would make an excellent administrator! Johnny Au (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 46) Support - past contributions reveal an excellent article editor with a wealth of experience in the 'machinery' of Wikipedia. Should make a great admin. Euryalus (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 47) Support - Wow, impressive user. Give em' the mop. :p Tiptoety  talk 01:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 48) Support - No problems here —ossmann talk 20:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 49) Support - Seems solid in my book. ArcAngel (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 50) Support - Extensive line of edits. Puts helper tools to good use. Can be a good admin.  U z E E  21:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 51) Support - Good editor. - Shudde   talk  00:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 52) Excellent user: will make great use of the tools. Acalamari 00:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 53) Support - With 20,000 solid edits and a great track record, why not? Littleteddy (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 54) Support I'll join in before this closes. -- Groggy Dice T | C 15:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 55) suppport JoshuaZ (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)