User:Ckbarnfield02/Autonomous Feminism/Kpineda Peer Review

Is there a strong opening sentence or phrase?

Yes, I felt you went directly to stating this that Autonomous Feminism is a framework typically used in Latin America and then subsequent sentences unraveled the actual definition.

Is there sufficient attention to the larger historical, cultural, or geographic context?

Although your page is not completed I see that that you did write about is's emergence in 1970s and I think it's great you are addressing it by timeline. I think an issue I see here is the generalization of Latin America. It would be great of you could point to some of the geographic regions you are referencing.

Is there a broad framing of the topic and attention to other related Wikipedia pages?

Yes I also see that you cited via url link to to other wiki pages that already exist of some of the concepts you are referencing!

Is there a strong organization and structure of the wiki?

Yes organization is great! Again since it's not completed so I can't give you as much feedback on content but I do see you have headers. I think it's great that you are constructing this page based off of it's emergence by time period but again reference general geographic regions.

Are there a range of substantive and high-quality sources?

I think it would be more credible if you added a few more sources, but i also do not know if enough sources exist. From the sources you have used they are all substantive and high quality. I see that some of your sources are from reliable databases.

Do these sources work well together to illuminate a topic in compelling ways?

Yes they all stay aligned to your main topic, great job!

Is there any biased language?

Not necessarily, from what I read it all seems fact based! But again I would also have this reviewed by someone else since we have learned about Autonomous Feminism in class and my opinion might be biased!

Any feedback on grammar and style?

Some comments I would make here is to make the text less passive by directly stating the fact. For example you wrote, "The 1970s was a time when women began to gain more gendered consciousness and challenge the patriarchy within their geopolitical climate and demand social change." but you could just say "In the 1970s women began to gain more gendered consciousness and challenge the patriarchy within their geopolitical climate and demand social change."

Is the language clear, accessible, and impartial?

I think the language itself is clear but my only concern is that if people have no context in Latin American it might seem overwhelming.

Are there visual materials?

No visual materials.

Any other suggestions?

Something that stood out to me is that you are covering Autonomous Feminism in relation to Latin America so maybe consider changing the title? It seems that most of the content is centered around Latin America!

Also when referencing specific women's movement or organizations, you should reference what specific country they originated from. It seemed like you were dumping organization/groups with crediting where they were formed!

User:Ckbarnfield02/Autonomous Feminism/Kpineda Peer Review,

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)