User:Ckeane21/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:365 Crete earthquake

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is titled as 365 Crete earthquake and was hoping to see any connections to class specifically to the sanctuary where a body was found with brain trauma. When I read the first sentence, however, I was confused by what year the earthquake happened as they give no lead in context.

Evaluate the article
As I said in why I chose to evaluate this article, the initial sentence is very vague in what point it is trying to get across. I at first read the 365 as the year the earthquake had happened, but the lead in initially made me question if that was correct. The only reason I found out for sure that the 365 was referring to the year is because of a fun fact listed.

-There is so little content on this article that the previous writer makes multiple points to say they they do not have access to much of the resources.

-Most of what is being said in the article comes from the perspective of the writer. There is multiple "I" statements and many times they say "we" but it is not quite clear who "we" is in reference to.

-There are no images used on this article.

-There are references and links but they are scattered poorly throughout the article, and at the bottom of the article there is the section for external links that comes before the section explaining how the earthquake might have happened.

- Over all the organization needs to be fixed, the point of view cannot be from the author of the article, there needs to be imagery, and there has to be more direct content and not asking for things to be added.