User:Ckyin19/Uterine artery embolization/CourseAccount2024 Peer Review

General info
Ckyin19
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to article you're reviewing
 * Uterine artery embolization

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The article is well written, with appropriate sources and grammar
 * The sources and links work correctly
 * Readability is intact throughout
 * The article mainly follows the guidelines. I would suggest updating the Adverse effects section to the title of either Risks, Complications, or Risks/Complications per the manual guidelines. I think the Pre-operative preparation section is great, but would follow the outline better as subsection of the Technique section. I would also suggest maybe updating the Outcomes heading to Recovery to match the manual.
 * The technique section could benefit from some condensing, or even separating the section with sub-headings. A few more citations seem to be needed for this section if possible. Overall very well written, but a bit in-depth for the target audience.
 * The additional sources are great. If possible, removal/update of some less recent (>10years) sources would elevate the article
 * Overall an awesome job, with a lot of efforts. I can tell you added a lot to the article!
 * Going through your goals, these were well thought-out and met. Including:
 * The lead section was expanded for indications
 * The OR image added is a great addition to help visualize the procedure environment
 * Contraindication section was created
 * Citations were added throughout
 * Outcomes added/expanded

~