User:Cl0509/Sourdough/Farres Kamel Peer Review

This is very good. The new content is definitely relevant and is super important for people that have actually just contracted lyme disease. What I love about these new subsections is that they are very useful for people in real life situations, as well as being useful for overall research. I believe that when reading an article about Lyme disease, it is totally reasonable to have a section about Integrated Tick Management Strategies, because essentially 100% of people reading the article will definitely want to keep themselves safe from ticks and therefore Lyme disease.

The bibliography looks great. Solid sources and good citing. The sources are current and the links work.

The tone seems very accurate to a normal wikipedia tone, all content is up to date. There is a lot of missing content from the original article, but I think that is just a mistake. If the new sections were added to the current article, they would totally fit in.

The content is super easy to read, especially because it is important for real life situations.

However, the article needs more pictures. This makes it even easier to read and more aesthetically pleasing. The article also needs clickable words that will take you to more info. For instance, the world Borrelia.

All in all, with a few changes, this will be super super good.

General info
Naifalbasheer
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Naifalbasheer/Lyme disease
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Lyme disease

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)