User:ClaireFra/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminist foreign policy

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is very relevant to our class, Political Science 328: Gender and International Relations. I also chose this article because I am familiar with Canada's recent Feminist International Assistance Policy and I wondered if it was missing from this page. At first glance the page seems relatively short but the information included seems valid.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

- Citations and unbiased neutral tone is consistent.

-The article is well organized, the sections are logical and most large blocks of text are divided into smaller, more palatable segments. Bullet points are a good addition.

-The articles references many facts, figures and people of note, adding reliability to the article.

-Lead section is of good length, informative yet not overbearing.

-The talk page is silent.

Overall, it is a well executed article it is simply lacking content, both in words and images.