User:Clairedonaldson/Aphasia/Cire2002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Clairedonaldson)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Clairedonaldson/Aphasia - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphasia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, I believe the new content that you've found with your source could improve the quality of the article that you've chosen. They are definitely neutral and they are easy to understand. Furthermore, the source used for your edits is very reliable in the context of this article. As far as improvements go, my main suggestion would for you to consider what sections you want each of your edits to go in the article. For example, "21-38% of acute stroke patients experience aphasia" could fit well in the Aphasia section, since there are other related statistics present in this section. Organizing your edits like this could help you maintain the already-established structure of the article while implementing your new content into the sections that are most relevant to them.