User:Clancyelizabeth/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Social science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because my major is psychology, which is considered a social science. Social sciences matter because they help us understand humans and human behavior. My first impression of this article was that it was very involved and well cited.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article provides a good foundation on what the article is about, without going into too much detail. The article covers a very wide variety of content related to the topic, but some of the sections are much longer than others. It seems that all of the content belongs, but there doesn't seem to be anything relating to underrepresented populations. The last section also seems to be pieces of random information that are not well developed. The tone of the article is neutral, and there are no perspectives too heavily used. The sources used in this article are well cited, but not all seem to be reliable sources. The article is well-organized, but there are parts that are not well-written. The images are well-captioned, but they could be more relevant to the topics discussed. The Talk page has discussions that have been started, but there is not much involvement in the discussions. The article is "of-interest" to several Wikiprojects. The article's over-all status is "C-Class," which indicates that it could definitely be improved. The article's organization is strong, but it needs to be checked for writing quality and sources need to be verified as reliable. The article also seems to be a little under-developed - for such a broad topic, there should be more detail. Editors on the talk-page have brought up topics that should be more fully investigated and developed.