User:Clandry10/Libyan jird/Snowr23 Peer Review


 * 1) First,     what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that     impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear     way?

The article does a great job of describing the animal. I was impressed by the Ecology section and just how detailed it was without being too wordy.


 * 1) What     changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those     changes be an improvement?

I think that they could take the Ecology section and split it into another section. It would improve the flow of the article.


 * 1) What's     the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

I think all that is needed is for their information to be accurate and to align with what is already written in terms of style and flow.


 * 1) Did     you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be     applicable to your own article? If so, what?

Yes, I noticed that this article maintained lots of information that is credible although only using 6 references.


 * 1) Are     the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more     sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information     they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it?

Yes, the sections are organized well. Yes, the information that they are adding does make sense where they are putting it.


 * 1) Is     each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject?     Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything     off-topic?

It feels as though that the Ecology section will catch readers’ attention with its size over the rest of the article.


 * 1) Does     the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one     particular point of view?

No, the article does not try to convince the reader one way or another.


 * 1) Are     there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the     best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such     as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y."

No, I did not find any phrases that were not worded neutral.


 * 1) Are     most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as     textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published     authors?

Most statements are connected to a reliable source.


 * 1) Are     there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may     lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single     point of view.

Although there are only 6 sources, the article remains unbalanced and provides a neutral view to this species.


 * 1) Are     there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you     can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source     listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately!

There are no unsourced statements in this article.