User:ClassyIam/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Kung Fu Panda franchise

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Kung Fu Panda is a great family-friendly film that I grew up with, and I thought it would be a good article to practice evaluating because I'm familiar with the franchise and want to see how a good article explains it. My preliminary impression of the Wiki article is that it's incredibly informative and concise with many relevant links and more information about the topic than I expected to find.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: Detailed and concise

Content: Exceptionally vast, encompassing everything surrounding the Kung Fu Panda movies, shows, amusement events, etc.

Tone and Balance: Seems to be a neutral point of view that mentions everything it needs to about Kung Fu Panda.

Sources and References: The second citation linked to a 2008 Toonzone article that couldn't be reached, but that may have been a problem on my end. It's the oldest retrieved source on the article, so it may be a broken link.

Organization and Writing Quality: Well-organized and very well-written. I aspire to writing this well.

Images and Media: Although it has the choice to reference more images, many of the topics link to other more specific Wiki articles that showcase relevant images, so I believe this more general article does everything it needs to in terms of image use.

Talk Page Discussion: I accidentally stumbled into the "Talk" page for the Kung Fu Panda (film) instead of the Kung Fu Panda franchise and there was a discussion there about the use of names "Oogway" and "Shifu," as well as fighting styles that I thought to be interesting; although, despite being blatantly obvious, they didn't make it into the article because they couldn't be properly cited.

Overall Impressions: Despite my praise for this article, it apparently only has C-status. I'm not entirely sure what that means, but it seems to be lower than B or A.