User:Clast98/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Loie Fuller article:
 * 1) Some of the information in the "Career" section of the article didn't really seem relevant to her career.  They seemed like they would have fit better in a section that focused on her personal life or a similar topic.  The "Career" section also seems to jump around chronologically, along with some of the information being rather vague or lacking in details. Some of the information in her "Career" section spoke of her friendship with the Queen of Romania and a scheme they had.  It seemed very out of place, it may have fit better in another section of the article but it also did not seem extremely important to include in the article.
 * 2) The article seems unbiased, full of straightforward, factual information.  However the information seems underdeveloped.  The information would be stronger with more supporting facts.  It seems that the article touches on multiple small pieces of information without really going in depth on any of the information.  However, there did not seem to an emphasis or overload on one area of information; it all seemed rather equal.
 * 3) The information on her life and career prior to being recognized for her skirt dancing, along with the information after her rise to fame in Europe, seemed very underdeveloped.  The information about her dance students was underdeveloped too.  There were a few topics such as her relationship with the Queen of Romania and her membership with the French Astronomical Society that seemed unnecessary and therefore a bit overdeveloped.
 * 4) The links in the references all seem to work and to go to reliable sources.
 * 5) Some of the facts, such as the evolution of her stage name in Europe did not seem to have clear or direct citations.
 * 6) None of the information seems to be out of date.  The information on her later career seems to be missing many parts of important information.  Some of the information seems to be chronologically disordered as well.
 * 7) On the talk page there was very little discussion. The most recent post was from March 2017.  However, posts prior occurred multiple years before with large gaps and great infrequency.  The posts did not seem to reply to one another either.  Many were just statements that never received a response.
 * 8) In the Talk page, the article is associated with five WikiProjects.  In all five it is given the rating of Start-Class.
 * 9) This article has less information on her impact on the modern dance movement.  In class we gained more detailed information while this had many broad topics that it just touched on, instead of going in depth.