User:Clauf20/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Pinta (disease)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

''I chose Pinta because the article appears to be underdeveloped and I believe that its important for people to have access to information that is accurate. My first impression of the article was that it seemed rushed or done without much access to some information, as the article itself is short, has few sources, and is missing information that can be addded like its epidemiology.''

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article appears to be very concise, however it appears to be at the point where some necessary information is missing (like its epidemiology). The articles the original creator used appear to be from between 2009 and 2014 and includes WebMD as one of the three sources. I also noticed some issues with linking other Wikipedia articles