User:Clemson14/Evaluate an Article

Cell Signaling
(Provide a link to the article here.)

== I chose Cell Signaling because I will be editing scientists pages, so I wanted to get a look at how scientific pages were structured. It matters because cell signaling explains how all living things function and work internally. Without cell signaling, living things would not be able to to any of the functions they currently do. My preliminary impression is that the article is very well laid out, and structure in order to provide the reader with the best order of information. ==

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== Everything seems to be very relevant to the topic, and goes just in depth enough for a solid knowledge of the topic. Nothing distracted me, but the figures and tables caught my attention, and were all informative and necessary. From my knowledge, all of the information was up to date and there were no large gaps. I cannot identify any notable equity gaps. The only improvement I would make, is adding a couple more figures. Many people are visual learners, including myself, so the figures allow readers to better understand the content and concepts. The tone is very neutral and informative. There isn't any part of the article that I found to be biased. The information was well represented, and portrayed in an educational manner. I checked over 10 links and they all worked. Looking more in depth, the facts and figures that were included were all backed up by the citations listed. These sources are all academic journals, or other neutral sources that we find reliable. There are over 50 citations, so there is a very diverse representation of information within this article. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)