User:Clenakev/Alvise Gritti/DFox03 Peer Review

Lead

- Lead is effective and informative, no changes necessary as you have seemed to agree with your sandbox draft

Content

- Content added is relevant with plenty of sources to support statements

- Up to date

Tone and Balance

- Attempted coup paragraph could be a bit more neutral, a long quote which I don't see necessary

- Tone in Governor of Hungary addition is perfect, nicely done

Sources

- Appropriate amount of sources for a single paragraph, cites well without over doing it

Organization/Images

- Organization is really good, I think the governor paragraph will enhance the article quite a bit, which was an apparent gap in reading the article the first time

- I tried to look for a few more images but the only thing I could find was of his father, or else I would say to add more images. Maybe professor has something for that?

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)