User:Clhild/Denali National Park and Preserve/Mwgillogly Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Clhild


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Clhild/Denali National Park and Preserve - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Denali National Park and Preserve - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

Has not been modified.

Content:

Added content is relevant to the article. Content that has been added is up-to-date.

Tone and Balance:

The content added is neutral, though a majority of the sources are from the NPS. There is no active persuasion but adding more academic, peer-reviewed sources could balance the article.

Sources and References:

All sources are relevant and updated. A majority of the sources are from the national parks website, only two are outside sources. The links worked.

Organization:

The content was clear. The sentence structure could be changed to make the sentences more concise.

Images and media:

There has not been any images or media added to the article.