User:ClimateGuardian/Nonpoint source pollution/Jessicasabatini Peer Review

General info
ClimateGuardian
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Trey.Tibman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ClimateGuardian/Nonpoint source pollution:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nonpoint source pollution

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi!

Overall, good edits! I think the content was relevant, organized and up-to-date! I feel as if your tone was neutral, as you just added facts and examples. According to the guiding questions, your sources should have secondary sources to back up the information, I think that may be a good idea for reliability purposes.

I noticed that you added some facts about sediments in terms of nonpoint source pollution that were really helpful! One of them is a great add, "With an increased sediment load into a body of water, the oxygen can also be depleted or reduced to a level that is harmful to the species living in that area[1]", but I think maybe adding a second sentence with more detail on how the oxygen is being reduced. I think it may make the idea just a little more clear. Furthermore in this section, I think the addition of flooding due to sedimentation was a great edit! Also, the example you guys added to the urban NPS section was a great idea! It may help readers understand there's at least some type of management for NPS pollution!

All in all, I think the article was improved! The material added gave more insight on NPS pollution, both its effects and the mitigation efforts. I think just a little more information should be given to the points added to the article. I think the information is important and more detail may clear up some ideas. Good job guys!