User:Clm893/Dispositional affect/Personality Dude Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Clm893


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Clm893/Dispositional_affect?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dispositional affect

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like your idea to add on to the discussion of the difference between mood and emotion and dispositional affect--these topics seems only lightly brushed on in the current article, even though it is critical to the concept. Adding an example of both to compare and contrast the ideas might help illustrate the point, too. However, I do not see any sources cited for this section. Maybe it would be redundant, but I think it would be thorough and constructive to cite a source when discussing the differences, even if it is only to define mood and emotion.

I like the idea of adding dimensions of affectivity. This seems like a good application of our classroom learning. It is mentioned in the draft, but I believe this section will need sources added as well. This might not be applicable, but consider researching if there are other types of affectivity other than just simply positive and negative. Also, another dimension of affectivity might be the magnitude it is expressed, but I am not for sure. It might be worth looking in to if resources permit.

Is it possible to expand on the workplace topics? Working memory certainly affects workplace performance, but from the information you are adding, this section could be called "disposition and working memory" and could probably just be included in the "Physical and mental effects" section. Since one of your sources discusses workplace bullying though, I think that enough ideas could be drawn from that to create a "disposition and the workplace" section. But, it seems like the idea of disposition relating to working memory could go in the "Physical and mental" section with the other effects of dispositional affect.

Overall, I think the sources are really good and are rich with information. They are also the exact kind of trustworthy secondary review sources that we were told are best to use. There is a lot of great material here. I learned a lot just reviewing your work, so this will certainly contribute to the betterment of Wikipedia no matter which direction you go with it. :)