User:CloodM/Pseudoceros/Sheridantaylor17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Clood M


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:CloodM/Pseudoceros


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
It looks like there is a good start. Citations are linked, the article is separated into different sections with headings. Some of the sections are kind of small and could use some more detail if its available (I don't know if you have more sources to go through or not but if you do then disregard this comment). The article is unbiased and just provides facts. I think in the beginning it would be helpful to link a definition/ page to words like anastomosed intestine, or rumed pharynx so people know what that is.