User:Cmanzflo/Pink tax/Bree624 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cmanzflo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
LEAD:

The lead of the article seems fine and goes with the texts in the sections.

CONTENT:

I think you did a good job at adding your edits in to places where they make sense!

Maybe adding more to the comments on Argentina and their Pink Taxes would be a good addition.

Your addition on the reintroduction of the Pink Tax Reveal is a great addition but adding more context or fitting it in better to that paragraph may help it flow better with the rest of the things written.

I feel that the comment on Congresswoman Jackie Speier being a fighter for equal rights is almost awkwardly thrown in there, working into the rest of the paragraph can help.

TONE & BALANCE :

I feel there is good balance in the article and it is relatively neutral.

SOURCES:

Your sources seem to go well and are up to date.

ORGANIZATION:

Organization can be a bit better there are a few things that feel a little out of place to the rest of the paragraphs as I mentioned in "content"

OVERALL:

Overall I think this is a good article, you can make look back and make sure everything goes smoothly together. You can try to add more sources and insight on specific comments you brought up.