User:Cmariee/Wolfsbane (animation studio)/Fairytails123 Peer Review

NOTE FROM COURSE INSTRUCTOR: I also agree this is a great start and especially appreciate the tables and incorporation of the list of partners. It has a neutral tone overall, but there are a few copy edits that could be made for clarity and tone. I often recommend just reading this outloud to make sure it flows. More important for me - and likely for any of the editors that will engage with it on the main site - is that there aren't many sources listed here. I imagine that there are news articles or magazine profiles about the studio (some of which have informed this writing, e.g. their move to a new headquarters, partnerships, etc.) These need to be incorporated into the final or I don't think it will be accepted as having enough valid support. Everything looks real solid on your edits. Love the incorporation of the partners with the studio and everything sounds very neutral and well thought out. Pretty solid edits!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)