User:Cmh6798/Social Media and Mental Health/CJG6268 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CMH6798


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cmh6798/Social_Media_and_Mental_Health/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

Evaluate the drafted changes
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes, from what I have seen, this user has done so.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes, this article does have this display.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Yes, there are heading depicting different sub-points.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

It is concise. But certain aspects need to be cut back.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

I did not notice any equality gaps present in this person's topic.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

Yes


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No, purely informatiional.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes


 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

Yes


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes


 * Are the sources current?

Yes


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

No


 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

I have a similar topic and would use these sources in my research.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

Yes


 * Are images well-captioned?

Yes


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

Yes


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Yes