User:Cmurphy22/Acetobacter aceti/Jkim777 Peer Review

General info
Anikait Chand, Cmurphy22, K8teJ
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cmurphy22/Acetobacter aceti
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Acetobacter aceti

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead contains much content that is not reflected in the main article itself. Consider creating a new section to discuss the bacteria's history, environment, and microbiology. Because the lead has so much content, it does not provide a short and concise overview of the entire article itself.

The content added is relevant to the bacteria and is up-to-date. There does not seem to be content that does not belong. However, more info about the cell structure, metabolic pathways, genome, and pathology/transmission/treatment of pineapples could be added.

The content added is neutral and does not appear to be biased.

The references found in this article are rather disorganized, with some entries being incomplete and missing a date. There is also a reference that seems to be floating without an actual number and positionin the article. The articles are rather current, but many are more than 10 years old.

In terms of organization, much of the added content could be revised for proper grammar and tone. There are grammatical and spelling errors in each section.

No images or other media has been added.

There's a lot of great information and work done in this article. Keep up the good work, and the page will be great. :)