User:Cmustudent117/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Does the article lead (aka lede) provide a clear overview of the main article content? Yes, Usually profiles with names provide a clear overview of the main article content.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Honestly, I thought the content about his genealogy was kind of irrelevant. I was not sure why it was needed or what it really even means.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I actually think this article does a great job at not being biased. The article does not champion him too much nor does it make him seem lower than he actually is. The article tells the facts the way they are.

Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or under-represented? I don't really see any.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Every fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? It seems like there was a gap from 2013 - 2017 and I do not see any events in that area.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links all work and they do support each fact they are using.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are discussing whether or not to include Yo Yo Ma's sister. Also, they seem to argue that the information about his wife is wrong.

How is the article rated? Here is a link to a tool that shows the automatically-assessed quality of a Wikipedia article revision: http://128.2.204.76:8000/ArticleQuality How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?