User:Cnovielli/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Web colors

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Web colors are related to computer science and I really think the hex code is interesting!!

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: The lead section uses facts only to convey to the reader what web colors are specifically as well as what they are used for. It does provide a concise overview as well as a brief description of the article's major sections.

Content: The article's content is relevant and up to date.

Tone and Balance: The article is from a neutral point of view, it contains only facts.

Sources and References: The sources are mostly recent (from 2006 to 2020) and from reputable sources.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is well written and well organized.

Images and Media: The article includes images of tables that show each color along with their corresponding codes. This helps a reader visualize each color.

Talk page discussion: Many comments are about fixing errors on the page or reporting what they do not like about the page. For example:

"I'm finding this page confusing and disorganized.


 * 1) Explaining how hex colours works seems like it deserves its own, small page.
 * 2) Many people want to quickly search for a named web colour they see online. This is frustrating right now because there are too many separate pages to search, and it isn't obvious on a quick scan of the intro paragraph. Further, some colours like "java" aren't included in the expanded list of colours.
 * 3) The focus on HTML 4 seems very outdated and distracting.

Ratings:


 * 1) Wikiproject Color: rated c-class, mid-importance
 * 2) Wikiproject Internet: rated c-class
 * 3) Wikiproject Computer Science: rated c-class, mid-importance

Overall Impressions

While the article's overall status is C, but I think it is well-organized, concise, and clearly explains web colors and how they function. The charts with the actual colors in them are especially helpful. I think that the article doesn't need to be improved at all.