User:Cocomelon2005/Emma Tenayuca/NDNhistorical Peer Review

Questions:
1.is there content missing or content that does not belong?

2.Does the lead include a brief description of the articles major sections?

3. Is the content well organized?


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jayda and Aporinta's


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cocomelon2005/Emma_Tenayuca?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Emma Tenayuca

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)